SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L
SPY5.L (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPY5.L tracks the S&P 500 while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPY5.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for PQVM.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPY5.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.
Performance
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPY5.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 16.65% return.
SPY5.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
PQVM.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 17.79%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.31% | 17.43% | 25.36% | 26.64% | -18.68% | 29.28% | 17.52% | 30.85% | -5.09% | 14.46% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.65% | 13.66% | 30.17% | 6.82% | 0.52% | 26.13% | 8.05% | 25.07% | -6.99% | 18.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPY5.L and PQVM.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SPY5.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Financial Services
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Communication Services
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Healthcare
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Industrials
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Defensive
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Energy
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Utilities
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Real Estate
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
-
Basic Materials
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPY5.L
PQVM.L
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPY5.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 4.70 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 16.26 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPY5.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.06 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.96 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.87 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPY5.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum PQVM.L drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY5.L and PQVM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPY5.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -34.42% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -4.83% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.37% | -15.49% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -17.35% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.90% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.40% | +0.50% |
Volatility
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) have volatilities of 3.17% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPY5.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.15% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 8.76% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 11.01% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 16.13% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.13% | -0.89% |
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPY5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPY5.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison
SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than PQVM.L's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 0.89% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 2.29% | 1.64% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPY5.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.
SPY5.L tracks S&P 500, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY5.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.
Find the right allocation for SPY5.L and PQVM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer