SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SPY5.L (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - SPY5.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while IUIS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPY5.L returned 12.73%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for IUIS.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPY5.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIS.L.

Performance

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPY5.L achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than IUIS.L's 16.08% return.

SPY5.L

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 7.99%
• YTD: 8.93%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: 14.54%

IUIS.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: 8.43%
• YTD: 16.08%
• 1Y: 20.57%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: 13.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist)	8.93%	17.43%	25.36%	26.64%	-18.68%	29.28%	17.52%	30.43%	-6.64%	15.47%
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	16.08%	19.17%	17.53%	17.86%	-5.28%	20.71%	9.96%	28.50%	-12.85%	14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY5.L and IUIS.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017	0.76

The correlation between SPY5.L and IUIS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPY5.L	IUIS.L
Technology	39.1%	3.5%
Financial Services	11.1%	-
Communication Services	10.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	0.5%
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	7.8%	90.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.1%	5.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.3%	0.2%

Return for Risk

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY5.L

SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

IUIS.L

IUIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IUIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IUIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IUIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IUIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPY5.L	IUIS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.36	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.09	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.24	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.97	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.83	7.43	+2.40

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY5.L and IUIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY5.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum IUIS.L drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY5.L and IUIS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPY5.L	IUIS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-42.18%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-10.42%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.36%	-19.63%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.37%	-21.22%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-2.49%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-5.04%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.76%	-0.74%

Volatility

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L) is 3.07%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that SPY5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPY5.L	IUIS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	4.84%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.32%	12.66%	-3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.06%	15.16%	-3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	17.36%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.20%	19.49%	-3.29%

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPY5.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IUIS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPY5.L vs. IUIS.L - Dividend Comparison

SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while IUIS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist)	0.92%	0.97%	1.06%	1.19%	1.40%	0.99%	1.28%	1.44%	0.40%	1.14%	1.64%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPY5.L and IUIS.L in my portfolio?

SPY5.L and IUIS.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPY5.L or IUIS.L?

On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPY5.L or IUIS.L?

SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIS.L.

What is the main difference between SPY5.L and IUIS.L?

SPY5.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPY5.L and 0.15% for IUIS.L.