PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPY5.L is traded in USD, while ACWI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ACWI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPY5.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI.L's 11.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY5.L has outperformed ACWI.L with an annualized return of 15.36%, while ACWI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.67% annualized return.


SPY5.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.16%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.36%

ACWI.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.55%
6M
13.16%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
12.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.31%17.43%25.36%26.64%-18.68%29.28%17.52%30.85%-5.09%22.58%
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
11.55%22.95%17.67%21.68%-18.36%19.19%15.32%26.81%-9.98%23.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY5.L and ACWI.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2012

0.86

The correlation between SPY5.L and ACWI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPY5.L
ACWI.L

Technology

38.0%
29.2%

Financial Services

11.3%
16.5%

Communication Services

10.6%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.0%

Industrials

7.6%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.9%

Energy

3.4%
4.3%

Utilities

2.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.6%

Technology

SPY5.L
38.0%
ACWI.L
29.2%

Financial Services

SPY5.L
11.3%
ACWI.L
16.5%

Communication Services

SPY5.L
10.6%
ACWI.L
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPY5.L
9.8%
ACWI.L
9.3%

Healthcare

SPY5.L
8.4%
ACWI.L
8.0%

Industrials

SPY5.L
7.6%
ACWI.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPY5.L
4.7%
ACWI.L
4.9%

Energy

SPY5.L
3.4%
ACWI.L
4.3%

Utilities

SPY5.L
2.6%
ACWI.L
2.7%

Real Estate

SPY5.L
1.8%
ACWI.L
1.7%

Basic Materials

SPY5.L
1.7%
ACWI.L
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY5.L
SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPY5.LACWI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.18

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

13.81

+0.83

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY5.L and ACWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPY5.LACWI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.44

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.74

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.81

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.66

+0.29

Drawdowns

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY5.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI.L drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY5.L and ACWI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPY5.LACWI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-33.59%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-9.09%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-17.16%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-26.90%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-33.59%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.72%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-4.91%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.10%

-0.20%

Volatility

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) is 3.17%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that SPY5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPY5.LACWI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

3.36%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

9.21%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

11.86%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

15.24%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

15.66%

+0.58%

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPY5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPY5.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison

SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ACWI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.97%1.06%1.19%1.40%0.99%1.28%1.71%2.20%2.29%1.64%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SPY5.L and ACWI.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

SPY5.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ACWI.L is Global Equities. SPY5.L tracks S&P 500, while ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY5.L and 0.40% for ACWI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPY5.L and ACWI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer