PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXX vs. FLTDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (SPXX) and Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund (FLTDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXX achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly higher than FLTDX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXX has outperformed FLTDX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while FLTDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.


SPXX

1D
0.38%
1M
4.18%
YTD
4.21%
6M
6.63%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
10.16%

FLTDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXX
Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
4.21%9.78%27.10%0.85%-6.92%29.03%-0.37%25.36%-13.42%27.92%
FLTDX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund
0.63%4.30%1.47%4.09%-4.08%0.98%3.42%5.05%1.73%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXX and FLTDX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2005

-0.04

The correlation between SPXX and FLTDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXX vs. FLTDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXX
SPXX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SPXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FLTDX
FLTDX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLTDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (SPXX) and Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund (FLTDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXXFLTDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.69

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.01

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.27

5.55

-1.27

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FLTDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXX and FLTDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXXFLTDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.40

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.77

-1.37

Drawdowns

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXX drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than FLTDX's maximum drawdown of -8.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXX and FLTDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXXFLTDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-8.57%

-43.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-1.97%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-3.07%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.09%

-6.92%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.99%

-8.57%

-35.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.90%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-0.77%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

0.71%

+2.77%

Volatility

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (SPXX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund (FLTDX) at 0.62%. This indicates that SPXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXXFLTDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

0.62%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

1.30%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

1.66%

+10.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

2.21%

+13.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

2.42%

+15.99%

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTDX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXX vs. FLTDX - Dividend Comparison

SPXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than FLTDX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTDX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund
2.49%2.72%2.48%1.95%1.36%1.15%1.93%2.11%1.89%1.82%1.86%1.84%
SPXX
Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
7.33%7.48%6.87%7.82%7.30%5.27%6.56%6.44%7.98%5.69%5.14%7.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXX and FLTDX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to FLTDX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXX dropped -52.39% vs FLTDX's -8.57%.

FLTDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXX and FLTDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer