SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO
SPXU.TO (BetaPro S&P 500 2x Daily Bull ETF) and HXQ.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (Total Return), while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU.TO returned 29.05%/yr vs 21.14%/yr for HXQ.TO. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPXU.TO charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.
Performance
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXU.TO having a 14.19% return and HXQ.TO slightly higher at 14.56%. Over the past 10 years, SPXU.TO has outperformed HXQ.TO with an annualized return of 29.05%, while HXQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 21.14% annualized return.
SPXU.TO
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 29.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.42%
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$2.97M | CA$3.02M | CA$3.91M | |
| CA$5.20M | CA$5.09M | CA$7.76M |
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU.TO BetaPro S&P 500 2x Daily Bull ETF | 14.19% | 22.49% | 40.87% | 43.60% | -40.81% | 57.51% | 134.75% | 61.37% | -16.43% | 42.05% |
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF | 14.56% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 32.26% | 6.71% | 23.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SPXU.TO and HXQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Financial Services
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Communication Services
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Healthcare
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Industrials
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Energy
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Utilities
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Real Estate
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Basic Materials
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU.TO
HXQ.TO
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P 500 2x Daily Bull ETF (SPXU.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.90 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 5.49 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU.TO drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU.TO and HXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -31.60% | -28.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.73% | -12.43% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.54% | -22.58% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.90% | -31.60% | -16.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -31.60% | -28.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -7.80% | +3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | -5.72% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 4.30% | +0.43% |
Volatility
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P 500 2x Daily Bull ETF (SPXU.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) have volatilities of 6.96% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 6.71% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.38% | 15.67% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.64% | 18.98% | +6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.74% | 21.29% | +12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.77% | 21.07% | +26.70% |
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU.TO has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXU.TO nor HXQ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for SPXU.TO.
SPXU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. SPXU.TO tracks S&P 500 Index (Total Return), while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for SPXU.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for SPXU.TO and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer