PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXS.L vs. MIST.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXS.L is traded in USD, while MIST.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MIST.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXS.L achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than MIST.L's 1.66% return.


SPXS.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.96%
YTD
10.20%
1Y
-98.78%
3Y*
-74.11%
5Y*
-54.94%
10Y*
-27.39%

MIST.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.09%
6M
1.62%
YTD
1.66%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.20%-98.82%25.56%27.00%-18.53%29.64%17.89%8.22%
MIST.L
PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation
1.66%12.50%3.77%10.55%-11.69%-1.26%3.71%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXS.L and MIST.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MIST.L
MIST.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MIST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MIST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXS.LMIST.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.52

1.11

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

0.96

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

2.13

-3.35

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the MIST.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXS.L and MIST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than MIST.L's maximum drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.L and MIST.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXS.LMIST.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-26.32%

-72.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.07%

-4.21%

-94.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.07%

-7.89%

-91.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

-25.04%

-74.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.90%

-1.45%

-97.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-5.96%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.57%

1.91%

+78.66%

Volatility

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L) at 1.69%. This indicates that SPXS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXS.LMIST.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

1.69%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

4.92%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.43%

6.53%

+92.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.13%

8.59%

+38.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.27%

8.91%

+26.36%

Dividends

SPXS.L vs. MIST.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPXS.L nor MIST.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXS.L and MIST.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF, while MIST.L tracks PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXS.L and MIST.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer