PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXS.L having a 10.20% return and LGUS.L slightly higher at 10.34%.


SPXS.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.96%
YTD
10.20%
1Y
-98.78%
3Y*
-74.11%
5Y*
-54.94%
10Y*
-27.39%

LGUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
6M
9.90%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
21.64%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.20%-98.82%25.56%27.00%-18.53%29.64%17.89%30.86%-10.39%
LGUS.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF
10.34%17.98%25.09%28.66%-20.46%27.91%21.16%30.91%-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXS.L and LGUS.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.97

The correlation between SPXS.L and LGUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF

L&G US Equity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

LGUS.L
LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXS.LLGUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.52

1.32

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

2.59

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

9.99

-11.21

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXS.L and LGUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than LGUS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.L and LGUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXS.LLGUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-34.26%

-64.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.07%

-8.58%

-90.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.07%

-19.46%

-79.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

-25.64%

-73.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.90%

-0.49%

-98.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-5.30%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.57%

2.23%

+78.34%

Volatility

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXS.LLGUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.86%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

9.41%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.43%

12.47%

+86.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.13%

16.51%

+30.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.27%

18.10%

+17.17%

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPXS.L and LGUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXS.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPXS.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SPXS.L and LGUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L and LGUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF, while LGUS.L tracks L&G US Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and L&G.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXS.L and LGUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer