PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXS.L vs. IUES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXS.L achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 28.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXS.L has underperformed IUES.L with an annualized return of -27.46%, while IUES.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.75% annualized return.


SPXS.L

1D
-1.32%
1M
-0.60%
6M
8.00%
YTD
8.95%
1Y
-98.80%
3Y*
-74.24%
5Y*
-55.04%
10Y*
-27.46%

IUES.L

1D
0.75%
1M
5.21%
6M
21.22%
YTD
28.42%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.95%-98.82%25.56%27.00%-18.53%29.64%17.89%30.86%-5.19%21.62%
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.42%9.91%3.87%-0.66%63.84%51.95%-33.35%8.70%-18.12%-1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXS.L and IUES.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.43

The correlation between SPXS.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXS.LIUES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.51

1.27

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

2.22

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

5.67

-6.89

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the IUES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXS.L and IUES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than IUES.L's maximum drawdown of -66.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.L and IUES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXS.LIUES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-66.79%

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.07%

-16.33%

-82.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.07%

-20.90%

-78.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

-27.98%

-71.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

-66.79%

-32.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.91%

-8.88%

-90.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-14.18%

+6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.82%

6.40%

+74.42%

Volatility

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L) is 3.01%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that SPXS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXS.LIUES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

6.91%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

19.69%

-10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.43%

22.76%

+76.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.12%

26.74%

+20.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.28%

28.53%

+6.75%

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXS.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPXS.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXS.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUES.L.

SPXS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. SPXS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXS.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXS.L and IUES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer