SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L
SPXS.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - SPXS.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF while FWRA.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPXS.L returned -74.11%/yr vs 19.09%/yr for FWRA.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.
Performance
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXS.L achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 11.06% return.
SPXS.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- -98.78%
- 3Y*
- -74.11%
- 5Y*
- -54.94%
- 10Y*
- -27.39%
FWRA.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXS.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.20% | -98.82% | 25.56% | 10.97% |
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 11.06% | 22.42% | 18.04% | 10.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXS.L and FWRA.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SPXS.L and FWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXS.L
FWRA.L
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXS.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.52 | 1.34 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 2.68 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 10.70 | -11.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.L and FWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXS.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -16.50% | -82.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.07% | -8.78% | -90.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.07% | -16.50% | -82.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.90% | -1.16% | -97.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -1.92% | -5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 80.57% | 2.20% | +78.37% |
Volatility
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) is 2.73%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that SPXS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXS.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 3.20% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 10.60% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.43% | 12.88% | +86.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.13% | 13.61% | +33.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 13.61% | +21.66% |
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXS.L nor FWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPXS.L and FWRA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRA.L.
SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXS.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXS.L and FWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer