PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXS.L is traded in USD, while FTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FTWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXS.L achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly lower than FTWG.L's 11.46% return.


SPXS.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.96%
YTD
10.20%
1Y
-98.78%
3Y*
-74.11%
5Y*
-54.94%
10Y*
-27.39%

FTWG.L

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.26%
6M
9.89%
YTD
11.46%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.20%-98.82%25.56%10.97%
FTWG.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist
11.46%22.73%17.92%-13.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXS.L and FTWG.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.86

The correlation between SPXS.L and FTWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FTWG.L
FTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXS.LFTWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.52

1.35

-0.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

2.62

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

10.87

-12.10

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXS.L and FTWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.L and FTWG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXS.LFTWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-25.84%

-73.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.07%

-9.20%

-89.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.07%

-16.89%

-82.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.90%

-0.85%

-98.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-6.28%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.57%

2.22%

+78.35%

Volatility

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) is 2.73%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that SPXS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXS.LFTWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.43%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

9.88%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.43%

12.26%

+87.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.13%

17.60%

+29.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.27%

17.60%

+17.67%

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXS.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison

SPXS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTWG.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.26%1.34%1.50%0.70%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXS.L and FTWG.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FTWG.L.

SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF, while FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXS.L and 0.15% for FTWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXS.L and FTWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer