PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUT vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUT vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUT achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.


SPUT

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.05%
YTD
7.26%
6M
7.80%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUT vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPUT and PEPS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.93

The correlation between SPUT and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUT vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUT
SPUT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUT vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUTPEPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

2.45

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

3.22

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.45

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

3.26

+1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.62

15.28

+7.34

SPUT vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUT Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUT and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUTPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.45

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

1.05

+0.49

Drawdowns

SPUT vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUT drawdown since its inception was -10.55%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUT and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUTPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-21.26%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-9.80%

+5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.51%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-2.77%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

2.09%

-1.26%

Volatility

SPUT vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) is 1.50%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that SPUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUTPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

2.77%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

9.83%

-4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

13.06%

-5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

18.31%

-7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

18.31%

-7.05%

SPUT vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUT vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

SPUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%
SPUT
Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF
5.03%4.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPUT and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEPS has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to SPUT (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUT dropped -10.55% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 31.83% vs 18.82% for SPUT. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SPUT has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 31.83% return vs 18.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPUT.

SPUT has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPUT and 0.10% for PEPS.

SPUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUT and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer