PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUSX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic US Equity Fund (SPUSX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUSX achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 14.25% return.


SPUSX

1D
0.12%
1M
3.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*

RCKSX

1D
0.64%
1M
2.23%
YTD
14.25%
6M
14.99%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPUSX
Symmetry Panoramic US Equity Fund
11.78%13.14%17.83%19.93%-13.24%28.30%8.97%27.57%-9.00%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
14.25%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%13.75%19.05%-8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUSX and RCKSX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018

0.85

The correlation between SPUSX and RCKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUSX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUSX
SPUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic US Equity Fund (SPUSX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUSXRCKSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.21

1.84

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

2.67

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

5.22

-2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.01

14.54

-0.53

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUSX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUSXRCKSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.84

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.47

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.38

+0.30

Drawdowns

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUSX drawdown since its inception was -36.46%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUSX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.46%

-57.88%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.14%

-4.14%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-18.22%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-22.54%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.47%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-9.51%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.49%

+0.38%

Volatility

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

Symmetry Panoramic US Equity Fund (SPUSX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) have volatilities of 3.08% and 3.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.00%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

8.05%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

11.58%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

15.66%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

17.55%

+1.56%

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUSX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUSX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

SPUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than RCKSX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.48%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%
SPUSX
Symmetry Panoramic US Equity Fund
5.62%6.29%15.88%4.05%3.88%6.99%1.11%1.99%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUSX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUSX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to RCKSX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUSX dropped -36.46% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

SPUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUSX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer