PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUC vs. WLTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPUC vs. WLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPUC vs. WLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPUC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF
-3.92%22.64%25.37%27.50%-24.76%1.64%
WLTG
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
-1.62%24.55%26.90%17.00%-22.64%1.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUC achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than WLTG's -1.62% return.


SPUC

1D
1.11%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
-4.78%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*

WLTG

1D
1.10%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-1.62%
6M
2.02%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPUC vs. WLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than WLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPUC vs. WLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUC
SPUC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

WLTG
WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUC vs. WLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUCWLTGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

1.60

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

2.27

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.79

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.14

11.32

-5.18

SPUC vs. WLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUC Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the WLTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUC and WLTG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUCWLTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.60

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.56

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SPUC and WLTG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPUC vs. WLTG - Dividend Comparison

SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, more than WLTG's 4.50% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
SPUC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF
8.08%7.70%0.94%1.33%1.53%2.00%0.75%
WLTG
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
4.50%4.43%0.55%0.71%0.44%0.02%0.00%

Drawdowns

SPUC vs. WLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than WLTG's maximum drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and WLTG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUCWLTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-25.14%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.09%

-9.56%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.89%

-5.89%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-9.39%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

2.36%

+1.90%

Volatility

SPUC vs. WLTG - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPUCWLTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

5.70%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

10.93%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.54%

16.73%

+9.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

15.25%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

15.25%

+6.46%