SPTU vs. USFR
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
SPTU vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
SPTU vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and USFR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
USFR
SPTU vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.82 | 1.60 | +10.22 |
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum USFR drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -1.36% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.16% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 0.27% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 0.40% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 0.81% | -0.49% |
SPTU vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTU vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and USFR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while USFR is Government Bonds. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer