SPTU vs. FTSL
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while FTSL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. SPTU is passively managed, while FTSL is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTSL.
Performance
SPTU vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's 1.05% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
SPTU vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.90% | 0.87% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 1.05% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and FTSL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTSL
SPTU vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTU | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum FTSL drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and FTSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -22.67% | +22.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.76% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 2.12% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 3.35% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 5.18% | -4.86% |
SPTU vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTU vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than FTSL's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.42% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.66% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and FTSL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 2.66% for SPTU.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FTSL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.86% for FTSL.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and FTSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer