SPTU vs. EDGH
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management. SPTU is passively managed, while EDGH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EDGH.
Performance
SPTU vs. EDGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than EDGH's 5.36% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGH
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU vs. EDGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 0.87% |
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 5.36% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and EDGH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. EDGH — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDGH
SPTU vs. EDGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTU | EDGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. EDGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum EDGH drawdown of -10.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and EDGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | EDGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -10.83% | +10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.83% | +10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -2.23% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.74% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. EDGH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | EDGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 18.02% | -17.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 15.59% | -15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 15.59% | -15.26% |
SPTU vs. EDGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGH's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTU vs. EDGH - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than EDGH's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 1.12% | 1.18% | 3.19% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and EDGH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.12% for EDGH.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while EDGH is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 1.01% for EDGH.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and EDGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer