SPTU vs. BIB
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and BIB (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while BIB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BIB.
Performance
SPTU vs. BIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than BIB's 12.50% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIB
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 100.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
SPTU vs. BIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 0.87% |
BIB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | 12.50% | 24.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and BIB is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. BIB — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIB
SPTU vs. BIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTU | BIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. BIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum BIB drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and BIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | BIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -67.24% | +67.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -65.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.29% | +17.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -32.71% | +32.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. BIB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | BIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 40.43% | -40.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 43.60% | -43.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 46.39% | -46.06% |
SPTU vs. BIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BIB's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTU vs. BIB - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than BIB's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | 0.55% | 0.77% | 1.69% | 0.07% | 0.03% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and BIB have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIB.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.55% for BIB.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BIB is Leveraged Equities. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while BIB tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.95% for BIB.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and BIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer