SPSK vs. TMSF
SPSK (SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF) and TMSF (T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPSK is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Dow Jones Sukuk Total Return (No Coupon Reinvestment), while TMSF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. SPSK is passively managed, while TMSF is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPSK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for TMSF.
Performance
SPSK vs. TMSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPSK achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than TMSF's 1.77% return.
SPSK
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- —
TMSF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPSK vs. TMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPSK SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF | 0.14% | 0.15% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.77% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPSK and TMSF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPSK vs. TMSF — Risk / Return Rank
SPSK
TMSF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPSK vs. TMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF (SPSK) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPSK | TMSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPSK vs. TMSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSK drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, which is greater than TMSF's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSK and TMSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPSK | TMSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.83% | -2.28% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.35% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -0.37% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
SPSK vs. TMSF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPSK | TMSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 2.93% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 2.93% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 2.93% | +2.52% |
SPSK vs. TMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPSK vs. TMSF - Dividend Comparison
SPSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than TMSF's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSK SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF | 4.23% | 3.63% | 3.53% | 2.95% | 2.22% | 2.56% | 1.78% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 3.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPSK and TMSF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPSK.
SPSK has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 3.06% for TMSF.
SPSK is categorized as Global Bonds, while TMSF is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPSK and 0.37% for TMSF.
Find the right allocation for SPSK and TMSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer