PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SPQH.DE) and Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPQH.DE achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than DDOC.DE's -1.35% return.


SPQH.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.59%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.08%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

DDOC.DE

1D
4.54%
1M
8.73%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-5.71%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
-5.09%
5Y*
-9.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPQH.DE
Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
1.52%-4.41%21.88%6.82%
DDOC.DE
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD
-1.35%-2.99%3.18%-15.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SPQH.DE and DDOC.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPQH.DE
SPQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SPQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SPQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DDOC.DE
DDOC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SPQH.DE) and Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPQH.DEDDOC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.02

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

0.01

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

0.03

+4.78

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPQH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPQH.DE and DDOC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPQH.DEDDOC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.02

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

-0.49

+1.17

Drawdowns

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum DDOC.DE drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPQH.DE and DDOC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPQH.DEDDOC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.68%

-59.88%

+42.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-22.33%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-32.67%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-51.22%

+46.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-41.80%

+37.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

10.98%

-9.59%

Volatility

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SPQH.DE) is 1.63%, while Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that SPQH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDOC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPQH.DEDDOC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

6.20%

-4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

14.24%

-9.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.30%

20.70%

-13.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.79%

24.10%

-13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.79%

24.26%

-13.47%

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPQH.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DDOC.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPQH.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPQH.DE nor DDOC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPQH.DE and DDOC.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPQH.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPQH.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DDOC.DE.

SPQH.DE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DDOC.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. SPQH.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 9% (-3% to -12%) Buffer Protect Index, while DDOC.DE tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPQH.DE and 0.68% for DDOC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPQH.DE and DDOC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer