SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE
SPPY.DE (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPPY.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Scored & Screened Leaders Index, while QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPPY.DE returned 15.63%/yr vs 21.44%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPPY.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPPY.DE achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
SPPY.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPPY.DE State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF | 11.08% | 4.44% | 32.87% | 26.92% | -14.47% | 41.09% | 8.04% | 4.57% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 67.92% | -40.24% | 6.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPPY.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.35 |
The correlation between SPPY.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPPY.DE
QDVF.DE
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF (SPPY.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPPY.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 2.54 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.03 | 7.98 | +8.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPPY.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.82 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.79 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.28 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPPY.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPY.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPPY.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -65.81% | +32.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.71% | -17.23% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -27.13% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | -27.13% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.92% | +8.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.84% | -17.41% | +12.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 5.49% | -3.72% |
Volatility
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF (SPPY.DE) is 2.69%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that SPPY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPPY.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 7.70% | -5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 20.43% | -12.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 24.05% | -12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 26.95% | -11.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 28.68% | -11.11% |
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPPY.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPPY.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPPY.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPPY.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPPY.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPPY.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
SPPY.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. SPPY.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Leaders Index, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPPY.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for SPPY.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer