PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF (SPPY.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPPY.DE is traded in EUR, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPPY.DE having a 11.08% return and CSP1.L slightly higher at 11.55%.


SPPY.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
3.73%
YTD
11.08%
6M
11.08%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*

CSP1.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.44%
YTD
11.55%
6M
10.93%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPPY.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF
11.08%4.44%32.87%26.92%-14.47%41.09%8.04%4.57%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.55%3.67%33.49%22.33%-13.74%39.60%7.48%4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPY.DE and CSP1.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.93

The correlation between SPPY.DE and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPY.DE
SPPY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPPY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF (SPPY.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPPY.DECSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.58

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

12.99

+3.04

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPY.DE and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPPY.DECSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.27

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.98

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.02

-0.10

Drawdowns

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPY.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPY.DE and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPY.DECSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-32.91%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.71%

-7.17%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-22.35%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-22.35%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.40%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-4.11%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.98%

-0.21%

Volatility

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF (SPPY.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.16%. This indicates that SPPY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPY.DECSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.16%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

7.40%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.62%

11.29%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

15.06%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

16.08%

+1.49%

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPY.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPPY.DE vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPPY.DE nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SPPY.DE and CSP1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for SPPY.DE.

SPPY.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Leaders Index, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPPY.DE and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPY.DE and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer