SPPP vs. PSPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX).
SPPP is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Dec 19, 2012. PSPFX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Aug 2, 1983.
Performance
SPPP vs. PSPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPPP vs. PSPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -7.78% | 89.43% | -11.89% | -25.86% | -2.37% | -21.77% | 23.84% | 46.00% | 5.53% | 35.36% |
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | 5.05% | 80.27% | -3.74% | -7.67% | -12.39% | 13.97% | 37.05% | 7.80% | -24.97% | 19.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -7.78% return, which is significantly lower than PSPFX's 5.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPPP having a 9.27% annualized return and PSPFX not far behind at 9.17%.
SPPP
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -18.00%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 56.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
PSPFX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 24.43%
- 1Y
- 84.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPPP vs. PSPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PSPFX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPPP vs. PSPFX — Risk / Return Rank
SPPP
PSPFX
SPPP vs. PSPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPPP | PSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 3.15 | -2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 3.48 | -1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.54 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.64 | -3.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 18.63 | -13.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPPP | PSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 3.15 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.41 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.43 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.19 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPPP and PSPFX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SPPP vs. PSPFX - Dividend Comparison
SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | 0.79% | 0.83% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 15.68% | 18.92% | 5.49% | 1.90% | 4.70% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
SPPP vs. PSPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, smaller than the maximum PSPFX drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and PSPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPPP | PSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.09% | -79.09% | +20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.42% | -17.96% | -19.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.09% | -39.15% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.09% | -56.80% | -2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.22% | -15.91% | -15.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.42% | -42.65% | +16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 4.47% | +7.83% |
Volatility
SPPP vs. PSPFX - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) has a higher volatility of 16.95% compared to U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) at 10.47%. This indicates that SPPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPPP | PSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.95% | 10.47% | +6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 23.43% | +22.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.39% | 27.28% | +22.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.38% | 22.85% | +11.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 21.64% | +11.24% |