PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPP vs. NIKL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPPP vs. NIKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPPP vs. NIKL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
-7.36%89.43%-11.89%-14.49%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
4.61%52.05%-22.48%-17.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than NIKL's 4.61% return.


SPPP

1D
0.45%
1M
-16.26%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
14.96%
1Y
57.89%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
-4.12%
10Y*
9.32%

NIKL

1D
2.78%
1M
-15.83%
YTD
4.61%
6M
12.89%
1Y
90.01%
3Y*
-1.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPPP vs. NIKL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than NIKL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPPP vs. NIKL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP
SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NIKL
NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP vs. NIKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPPPNIKLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

2.19

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

2.72

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.03

-1.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.58

9.50

-4.92

SPPP vs. NIKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the NIKL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP and NIKL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPPPNIKLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.19

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.01

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP and NIKL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SPPP vs. NIKL - Dividend Comparison

SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.


TTM202520242023
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
2.42%2.53%3.49%19.52%

Drawdowns

SPPP vs. NIKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, roughly equal to the maximum NIKL drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and NIKL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPPNIKLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.09%

-60.23%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.42%

-29.33%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.91%

-20.08%

-10.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.43%

-27.00%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.43%

9.35%

+3.08%

Volatility

SPPP vs. NIKL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) is 15.09%, while Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) has a volatility of 16.87%. This indicates that SPPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPPPNIKLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.09%

16.87%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.37%

33.15%

+13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.37%

41.35%

+8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.37%

31.74%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.87%

31.74%

+1.13%