PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPP vs. GLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPP vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -25.48% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -10.89% return.


SPPP

1D
2.28%
1M
-17.16%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-30.01%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-7.64%
10Y*
6.70%

GLDY

1D
1.09%
1M
-9.57%
YTD
-10.89%
6M
-13.79%
1Y
2.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPPP and GLDY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.56

The correlation between SPPP and GLDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPP vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP
SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPPPGLDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.05

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.10

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

0.36

-0.04

SPPP vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is comparable to the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPPP vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and GLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPPGLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.09%

-25.90%

-33.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.66%

-25.90%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.42%

-20.76%

-23.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.53%

-4.58%

-21.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.18%

7.15%

+13.03%

Volatility

SPPP vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) is 12.63%, while Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) has a volatility of 15.17%. This indicates that SPPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPPGLDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.63%

15.17%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.29%

23.43%

+22.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.74%

24.79%

+26.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.13%

23.39%

+11.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.29%

23.39%

+9.90%

SPPP vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPPP vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPPP and GLDY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDY has higher volatility (15.17%) compared to SPPP (12.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPPP dropped -59.09% vs GLDY's -25.90%.

On 1-year performance, SPPP leads with 6.36% vs 2.54% for GLDY. On fees, GLDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SPPP has been the lower-risk option at 12.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPPP has performed better with a 6.36% return vs 2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for SPPP.

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 53.62%, compared with 0.00% for SPPP.

SPPP is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for SPPP and 0.99% for GLDY.

SPPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPP and GLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer