PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPP7.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPP7.DE achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than MDBU.DE's 1.02% return.


SPP7.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.25%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
-0.11%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
0.60%

MDBU.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.02%
6M
0.39%
1Y
1.13%
3Y*
0.83%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPP7.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.25%-3.30%5.21%1.24%-9.75%4.98%-0.10%11.45%1.88%
MDBU.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.02%-5.52%8.42%0.69%-1.90%6.58%-4.66%7.40%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPP7.DE and MDBU.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.79

The correlation between SPP7.DE and MDBU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPP7.DE
SPP7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SPP7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MDBU.DE
MDBU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MDBU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPP7.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPP7.DEMDBU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.04

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.30

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

0.72

+0.41

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPP7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the MDBU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPP7.DE and MDBU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPP7.DEMDBU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

0.21

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.23

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.22

-0.17

Drawdowns

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPP7.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.31%, which is greater than MDBU.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPP7.DE and MDBU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPP7.DEMDBU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.31%

-12.38%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-3.81%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-10.06%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.56%

-12.09%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.29%

-6.60%

-8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-5.71%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.57%

+0.12%

Volatility

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPP7.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.DE) at 0.90%. This indicates that SPP7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDBU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPP7.DEMDBU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.90%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

3.83%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

5.40%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.14%

7.21%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.49%

6.88%

+1.61%

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPP7.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPP7.DE vs. MDBU.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPP7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than MDBU.DE's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MDBU.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.66%3.79%1.92%1.75%0.75%0.59%1.58%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPP7.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.07%4.20%3.47%4.07%1.66%0.97%1.69%2.33%1.98%1.99%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPP7.DE and MDBU.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPP7.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPP7.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MDBU.DE.

SPP7.DE tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond, while MDBU.DE tracks Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPP7.DE and 0.18% for MDBU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPP7.DE and MDBU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer