PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPP3.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPP3.DE achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -0.73% return.


SPP3.DE

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
1.31%
6M
2.12%
1Y
-3.19%
3Y*
1.40%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
1.22%

CEMF.DE

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPP3.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPP3.DE
SPP3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SPP3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPP3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPP3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SPP3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPP3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMF.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPP3.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPP3.DECEMF.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.60

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPP3.DECEMF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.62

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between SPP3.DE and CEMF.DE is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPP3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SPP3.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.90%3.96%3.14%2.90%1.13%0.93%1.80%2.12%1.59%1.48%0.44%
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPP3.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.82%, which is greater than CEMF.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPP3.DE and CEMF.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPP3.DECEMF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.82%

-3.14%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-2.29%

-3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-0.81%

-5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

Volatility

SPP3.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPP3.DECEMF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

4.42%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.75%

4.42%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.39%

4.42%

+2.97%