PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (SPP2.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPP2.DE is traded in USD, while DBXW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DBXW.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPP2.DE achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than DBXW.DE's 9.63% return.


SPP2.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.55%
YTD
11.75%
6M
13.20%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*

DBXW.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
2.48%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.66%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPP2.DE
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
11.75%21.21%20.40%22.86%-16.46%21.23%11.03%
DBXW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
9.63%21.66%18.55%23.90%-18.61%22.25%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2020

0.95

The correlation between SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPP2.DE
SPP2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPP2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPP2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPP2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPP2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPP2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXW.DE
DBXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (SPP2.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPP2.DEDBXW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.03

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

13.13

+2.33

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPP2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPP2.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.20

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.71

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.41

+0.64

Drawdowns

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPP2.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum DBXW.DE drawdown of -57.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPP2.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-57.67%

+35.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-8.49%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-17.89%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-26.02%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.47%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-9.93%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.96%

-0.04%

Volatility

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (SPP2.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) at 2.95%. This indicates that SPP2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPP2.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.95%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

8.69%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

11.69%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

16.38%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.77%

16.35%

-1.58%

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

SPP2.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPP2.DE nor DBXW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

SPP2.DE tracks MSCI ACWI (USD Hedged), while DBXW.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPP2.DE and DBXW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer