PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOT vs. POWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SPOT vs. POWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOT achieves a -20.90% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 189.91% return.


SPOT

1D
-1.87%
1M
-11.64%
YTD
-20.90%
6M
-20.64%
1Y
-35.07%
3Y*
42.88%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*

POWL

1D
3.57%
1M
10.24%
YTD
189.91%
6M
174.62%
1Y
427.82%
3Y*
151.29%
5Y*
99.89%
10Y*
41.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOT vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
-20.90%29.80%138.08%138.01%-66.27%-25.62%110.40%31.76%-31.59%
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
189.91%44.49%152.21%155.62%24.34%3.60%-37.60%101.58%-5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOT and POWL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018

0.16

The correlation between SPOT and POWL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SPOT:

$96.13B

POWL:

$11.25B

EPS

SPOT:

€12.94

POWL:

$5.12

PE Ratio

SPOT:

30.96

POWL:

60.14

PEG Ratio

SPOT:

0.34

POWL:

0.09

PS Ratio

SPOT:

4.78

POWL:

9.93

PB Ratio

SPOT:

10.45

POWL:

15.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

SPOT:

€17.60B

POWL:

$1.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SPOT:

€5.68B

POWL:

$340.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

SPOT:

€2.75B

POWL:

$236.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOT vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPOT
SPOT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SPOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

POWL
POWL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
POWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
POWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOT vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPOTPOWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.67

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

13.97

-14.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

44.14

-45.41

SPOT vs. POWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPOT Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the POWL Sharpe Ratio of 7.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPOT and POWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPOT vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOT drawdown since its inception was -80.51%, which is greater than POWL's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOT and POWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOTPOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.51%

-73.10%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.80%

-30.88%

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.80%

-55.76%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.39%

-55.76%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.80%

-4.39%

-36.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.89%

-36.08%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.73%

9.75%

+17.98%

Volatility

SPOT vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison

Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) have volatilities of 16.88% and 17.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOTPOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.88%

17.67%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.35%

43.95%

-6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.57%

59.48%

-13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.59%

64.40%

-16.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.34%

54.90%

-7.56%

Dividends

SPOT vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison

SPOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.12%0.34%0.48%1.19%2.96%3.53%3.53%2.12%4.16%3.63%2.67%4.00%
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SPOT vs. POWL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Spotify Technology S.A. and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.61B
296.62M
(SPOT) Total Revenue
(POWL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SPOT values in EUR, POWL values in USD

SPOT vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Spotify Technology S.A. and Powell Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
32.9%
29.7%
Portfolio components
SPOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

POWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

SPOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported an operating income of 726.76M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

POWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

SPOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a net income of 732.86M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.

POWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPOT and POWL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWL has higher volatility (17.67%) compared to SPOT (16.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPOT dropped -80.51% vs POWL's -73.10%.

POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.27 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOT and POWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer