SPOG.L vs. XLES.L
SPOG.L (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF) and XLES.L (Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - SPOG.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while XLES.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPOG.L returned 8.27%/yr vs 10.50%/yr for XLES.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPOG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLES.L.
Performance
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPOG.L is traded in GBp, while XLES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLES.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOG.L achieves a 28.42% return, which is significantly lower than XLES.L's 32.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SPOG.L has underperformed XLES.L with an annualized return of 8.27%, while XLES.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.
SPOG.L
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 28.42%
- 6M
- 24.11%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
XLES.L
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 32.00%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- 44.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 21.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOG.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 28.42% | -0.88% | 0.57% | -2.90% | 54.40% | 69.37% | -33.93% | 4.75% | -17.09% | -12.48% |
XLES.L Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 32.00% | 1.00% | 5.10% | -4.65% | 81.11% | 53.54% | -35.86% | 7.12% | -13.56% | -9.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG.L and XLES.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SPOG.L and XLES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPOG.L
XLES.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
SPOG.L
XLES.L
Basic Materials
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Communication Services
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Financial Services
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Healthcare
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Industrials
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Real Estate
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Technology
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Utilities
SPOG.L
-
XLES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPOG.L
XLES.L
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPOG.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.85 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 8.91 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPOG.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.97 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.81 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.34 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG.L drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, which is greater than XLES.L's maximum drawdown of -63.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG.L and XLES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOG.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.49% | -63.08% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -15.71% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.87% | -24.42% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.90% | -24.42% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.97% | -63.08% | -8.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -7.71% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.50% | -15.44% | -11.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 5.03% | +1.34% |
Volatility
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) at 8.75%. This indicates that SPOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOG.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 8.75% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.82% | 19.06% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 22.87% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 26.71% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.94% | 28.56% | +3.38% |
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLES.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPOG.L vs. XLES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPOG.L nor XLES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOG.L and XLES.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPOG.L.
SPOG.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XLES.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPOG.L and 0.14% for XLES.L.
Find the right allocation for SPOG.L and XLES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer