SPOG.L vs. GCED.L
SPOG.L (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF) and GCED.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds - SPOG.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while GCED.L tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPOG.L returned 17.41%/yr vs -3.30%/yr for GCED.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPOG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCED.L.
Performance
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPOG.L is traded in GBp, while GCED.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GCED.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOG.L achieves a 28.42% return, which is significantly lower than GCED.L's 37.75% return.
SPOG.L
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 28.42%
- 6M
- 24.11%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
GCED.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 37.75%
- 6M
- 39.27%
- 1Y
- 92.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- -3.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOG.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 28.42% | -0.88% | 0.57% | -2.90% | 54.40% | 35.25% |
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 37.75% | 31.81% | -25.26% | -15.01% | -22.48% | -20.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG.L and GCED.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SPOG.L and GCED.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPOG.L
GCED.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
SPOG.L
GCED.L
Basic Materials
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
Communication Services
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
Consumer Defensive
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
Financial Services
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
Healthcare
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
-
Industrials
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
Real Estate
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
-
Technology
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
Utilities
SPOG.L
-
GCED.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPOG.L
GCED.L
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPOG.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.65 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 8.32 | -6.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 27.77 | -21.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPOG.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 4.19 | -2.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.13 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.23 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG.L drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, which is greater than GCED.L's maximum drawdown of -69.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG.L and GCED.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOG.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.49% | -69.62% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -11.00% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.87% | -52.78% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.90% | -68.49% | +35.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -28.63% | +18.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.50% | -40.60% | +14.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 3.30% | +3.07% |
Volatility
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) at 9.08%. This indicates that SPOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOG.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 9.08% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.82% | 15.29% | +7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 21.91% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 26.40% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.94% | 27.03% | +4.91% |
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GCED.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPOG.L vs. GCED.L - Dividend Comparison
SPOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.51% | 2.09% | 1.43% | 0.68% | 0.09% | 0.20% |
SPOG.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOG.L and GCED.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPOG.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPOG.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCED.L.
SPOG.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while GCED.L tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPOG.L and 0.60% for GCED.L.
Find the right allocation for SPOG.L and GCED.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer