SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L
SPOG.L (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPOG.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPOG.L returned 8.27%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for CSP1.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPOG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOG.L achieves a 28.42% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SPOG.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 8.27%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.
SPOG.L
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 28.42%
- 6M
- 24.11%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 29.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOG.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 28.42% | -0.88% | 0.57% | -2.90% | 54.40% | 69.37% | -33.93% | 4.75% | -17.09% | -12.48% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.49% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 10.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG.L and CSP1.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011 | 0.42 |
The correlation between SPOG.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPOG.L
CSP1.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
SPOG.L
CSP1.L
Basic Materials
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Communication Services
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Consumer Defensive
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Financial Services
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Healthcare
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Industrials
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Real Estate
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Technology
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Utilities
SPOG.L
-
CSP1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPOG.L
CSP1.L
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPOG.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.51 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.06 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 14.94 | -9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPOG.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.72 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.04 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 1.04 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.09 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG.L drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOG.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.49% | -25.48% | -51.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -7.12% | -10.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.87% | -20.77% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.90% | -20.77% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.97% | -25.48% | -46.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -0.29% | -10.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.50% | -3.32% | -23.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 1.94% | +4.43% |
Volatility
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.61%. This indicates that SPOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOG.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 2.61% | +7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.82% | 7.16% | +15.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 10.70% | +16.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 14.31% | +15.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.94% | 15.58% | +16.36% |
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPOG.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPOG.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOG.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPOG.L.
SPOG.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. SPOG.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPOG.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for SPOG.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer