SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L
SPMV.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ISPE.L (iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds from iShares - SPMV.L tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD while ISPE.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPMV.L returned 12.73%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for ISPE.L. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPMV.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ISPE.L.
Performance
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPMV.L is traded in USD, while ISPE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ISPE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMV.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than ISPE.L's 12.21% return.
SPMV.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.80%
ISPE.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.51M | $1.52M | $1.53M | |
| $4.60M | $3.80M | $3.05M |
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMV.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 5.21% | 11.55% | 18.68% | 9.94% | -3.30% |
ISPE.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 12.21% | 19.69% | 9.62% | 18.15% | -4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMV.L and ISPE.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPMV.L and ISPE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Financial Services
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Healthcare
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Consumer Defensive
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Energy
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Industrials
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Communication Services
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Basic Materials
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Utilities
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Real Estate
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPMV.L
ISPE.L
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (ISPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMV.L | ISPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.79 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.27 | 6.01 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than ISPE.L's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMV.L and ISPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMV.L | ISPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.34% | -24.90% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -9.53% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | -18.34% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -4.45% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 2.82% | -1.24% |
Volatility
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) is 2.19%, while iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (ISPE.L) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that SPMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMV.L | ISPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 3.47% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.43% | 10.27% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.55% | 13.91% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 19.09% | -6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 19.09% | -5.31% |
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMV.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISPE.L's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMV.L vs. ISPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPMV.L nor ISPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMV.L and ISPE.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISPE.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISPE.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD, while ISPE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPMV.L and 0.17% for ISPE.L.
Find the right allocation for SPMV.L and ISPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer