SPMD vs. SFLR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. SPMD is passively managed, while SFLR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPMD returned 15.42%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for SFLR. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMD charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.

Performance

SPMD vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMD achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.84% return.

SPMD

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 15.51%
• 6M: 14.03%
• 1Y: 27.96%
• 3Y*: 15.42%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

SFLR

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 16.87%
• 3Y*: 14.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMD vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF	15.51%	7.44%	13.91%	16.48%	0.19%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	3.84%	13.29%	19.99%	21.20%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMD and SFLR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.74

The correlation between SPMD and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPMD vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMD

SPMD Risk / Return Rank: 60
SPMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SPMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPMD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SPMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SPMD Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SFLR

SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 58
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMD vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPMD	SFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.72	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.29	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.33	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.40	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	9.51	+1.30

SPMD vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMD and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPMD vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMD drawdown since its inception was -57.62%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMD and SFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPMD	SFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.62%	-12.13%	-45.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-6.79%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.08%	-12.13%	-11.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.22%	+2.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.11%	-1.75%	-6.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	1.71%	+0.70%

Volatility

SPMD vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) at 3.81%. This indicates that SPMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPMD	SFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	3.81%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	7.29%	+4.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	9.46%	+6.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.75%	10.28%	+9.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	10.28%	+10.92%

SPMD vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMD has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPMD vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

SPMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than SFLR's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.32%	0.33%	0.42%	1.16%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF	1.21%	1.39%	1.42%	1.47%	1.64%	1.24%	1.30%	1.57%	1.85%	1.97%	2.13%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPMD and SFLR in my portfolio?

SPMD and SFLR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPMD or SFLR?

SPMD has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to SFLR (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMD dropped -57.62% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

Which ETF is better, SPMD or SFLR?

On 3-year performance, SPMD leads with 15.42% vs 14.88% for SFLR. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SFLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPMD or SFLR?

Over the 3-year period, SPMD has performed better with a 15.42% return vs 14.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPMD or SFLR?

SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPMD or SFLR?

SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.32% for SFLR.

What is the main difference between SPMD and SFLR?

SPMD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SFLR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPMD and 0.89% for SFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.