SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L
SPMD.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPMD.L tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index while PQVG.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPMD.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for PQVG.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.
Performance
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPMD.L is traded in USD, while PQVG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PQVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMD.L achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.50% return.
SPMD.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
PQVG.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 6M
- 17.93%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.29%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.17% | 11.56% | 18.70% | 9.87% | -10.96% | 24.92% | 7.60% | 30.93% | -4.56% |
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.50% | 13.83% | 30.09% | 6.31% | 0.51% | 26.62% | 7.64% | 26.02% | -10.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMD.L and PQVG.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SPMD.L and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Financial Services
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Healthcare
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Consumer Defensive
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Communication Services
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Industrials
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Energy
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Utilities
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Basic Materials
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
Real Estate
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPMD.L
PQVG.L
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMD.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 4.49 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 15.68 | -8.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMD.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.15 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.97 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.88 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, roughly equal to the maximum PQVG.L drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMD.L and PQVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMD.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.34% | -33.94% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -5.07% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.11% | -15.73% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -17.27% | -1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.06% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.96% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.45% | +0.14% |
Volatility
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) is 2.06%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that SPMD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMD.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.65% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.98% | 8.21% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.35% | 10.59% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 15.89% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 16.92% | -2.29% |
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMD.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison
SPMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than PQVG.L's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.30% | 0.72% |
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.16% | 1.15% | 1.28% | 1.46% | 1.35% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMD.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.
SPMD.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPMD.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.
Find the right allocation for SPMD.L and PQVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer