SPMD.L vs. 500D.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPMD.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and 500D.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both S&P 500 funds - SPMD.L tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index while 500D.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPMD.L returned 13.82%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for 500D.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPMD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500D.L.

Performance

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMD.L achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than 500D.L's 10.40% return.

SPMD.L

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 4.17%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: —

500D.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 27.93%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	4.17%	11.56%	18.70%	9.87%	-10.96%	3.36%
500D.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist	10.40%	17.37%	25.36%	26.84%	-18.54%	1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMD.L and 500D.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021	0.86

The correlation between SPMD.L and 500D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMD.L

SPMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
SPMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SPMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SPMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SPMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SPMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

500D.L

500D.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
500D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
500D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
500D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
500D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
500D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPMD.L	500D.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.42	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.53	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	3.33	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	14.61	-7.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the 500D.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMD.L and 500D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPMD.L	500D.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.42	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.78	-0.07

Drawdowns

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than 500D.L's maximum drawdown of -24.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMD.L and 500D.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPMD.L	500D.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.34%	-24.21%	-9.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-8.35%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.11%	-18.97%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.52%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-6.09%	+1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	1.91%	-0.32%

Volatility

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) is 2.06%, while Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that SPMD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 500D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPMD.L	500D.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	3.20%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.98%	8.41%	-2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.35%	11.48%	-3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.56%	16.39%	-3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.63%	16.39%	-1.76%

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 500D.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPMD.L vs. 500D.L - Dividend Comparison

SPMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than 500D.L's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
500D.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist	0.82%	0.90%	1.17%	0.93%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.16%	1.15%	1.28%	1.46%	1.35%	1.27%	1.54%	1.52%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPMD.L and 500D.L in my portfolio?

SPMD.L and 500D.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPMD.L or 500D.L?

On fees, 500D.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPMD.L or 500D.L?

500D.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPMD.L.

What is the main difference between SPMD.L and 500D.L?

SPMD.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while 500D.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPMD.L and 0.15% for 500D.L.