SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L
SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) and XSLR.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLT.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while XSLR.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPLT.L returned 11.07%/yr vs 22.57%/yr for XSLR.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPLT.L is traded in GBp, while XSLR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XSLR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than XSLR.L's 3.15% return.
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 74.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
XSLR.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 27.97%
- 1Y
- 115.67%
- 3Y*
- 42.25%
- 5Y*
- 22.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -5.28% | 104.63% | -8.37% | -10.78% | 23.96% | -10.18% | 26.24% |
XSLR.L Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities | 3.15% | 129.79% | 23.40% | -5.74% | 15.58% | -12.20% | 58.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLT.L and XSLR.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SPLT.L and XSLR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLT.L
XSLR.L
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLT.L | XSLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.96 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 6.49 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLT.L | XSLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.10 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.67 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.83 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than XSLR.L's maximum drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and XSLR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLT.L | XSLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -38.87% | -19.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.87% | -38.87% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.87% | -38.87% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | -38.87% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.43% | -33.73% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -14.05% | -20.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 17.77% | -1.36% |
Volatility
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) is 10.95%, while Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that SPLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSLR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLT.L | XSLR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 16.83% | -5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 51.96% | -10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 54.69% | -7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 33.62% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 33.58% | -5.66% |
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPLT.L and XSLR.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLT.L vs. XSLR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLT.L nor XSLR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLT.L and XSLR.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLT.L and XSLR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
SPLT.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while XSLR.L is Silver. SPLT.L tracks Platinum, while XSLR.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for SPLT.L and XSLR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer