SPLT.L vs. SILG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLT.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPLT.L returned 18.81%/yr vs 45.51%/yr for SILG.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLT.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.

Performance

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SPLT.L is traded in GBp, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than SILG.L's 5.62% return.

SPLT.L

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: -5.28%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 74.34%
• 3Y*: 18.81%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

SILG.L

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 6M: 16.67%
• 1Y: 98.68%
• 3Y*: 45.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC	-5.28%	104.63%	-8.37%	-10.78%	12.05%
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	5.62%	153.98%	13.53%	-6.34%	-8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLT.L and SILG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022	0.51

The correlation between SPLT.L and SILG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLT.L

SPLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
SPLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SPLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SPLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SPLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SPLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SILG.L

SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPLT.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.98	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.43	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	3.16	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	7.69	-3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLT.L and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPLT.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.98	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.68	-0.62

Drawdowns

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and SILG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPLT.L	SILG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.05%	-32.00%	-26.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.87%	-30.90%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.87%	-30.90%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.43%	-24.56%	-7.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.19%	-12.52%	-21.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.41%	12.74%	+3.67%

Volatility

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) is 10.95%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 18.48%. This indicates that SPLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPLT.L	SILG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.95%	18.48%	-7.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.59%	39.95%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.08%	49.23%	-2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.48%	39.40%	-8.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.92%	39.40%	-11.48%

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLT.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPLT.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPLT.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPLT.L and SILG.L in my portfolio?

SPLT.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPLT.L or SILG.L?

On fees, SPLT.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPLT.L or SILG.L?

SPLT.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

What is the main difference between SPLT.L and SILG.L?

SPLT.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while SILG.L is Silver. SPLT.L tracks Platinum, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPLT.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.