SPLT.L vs. IITU.L
SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLT.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLT.L returned 7.15%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLT.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLT.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 7.15%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 74.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -5.28% | 104.63% | -8.37% | -10.78% | 23.96% | -10.18% | 7.04% | 17.70% | -9.90% | -6.89% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLT.L and IITU.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLT.L
IITU.L
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLT.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.17 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 8.17 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLT.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.71 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.16 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 1.28 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.23 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLT.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -28.03% | -30.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.87% | -16.76% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.87% | -28.03% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | -28.03% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.00% | -28.03% | -16.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.43% | -2.89% | -29.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -5.14% | -29.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 6.51% | +9.90% |
Volatility
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 7.01%. This indicates that SPLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLT.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 7.01% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 14.45% | +27.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 19.60% | +27.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 21.94% | +8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 21.31% | +6.61% |
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLT.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLT.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLT.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLT.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPLT.L.
SPLT.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SPLT.L tracks Platinum, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPLT.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLT.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer