SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L
SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) and GOLB.L (Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF) are both Precious Metals funds - SPLT.L tracks the Platinum while GOLB.L tracks the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLT.L returned 7.15%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for GOLB.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLT.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOLB.L.
Performance
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPLT.L is traded in GBp, while GOLB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GOLB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than GOLB.L's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLT.L has underperformed GOLB.L with an annualized return of 7.15%, while GOLB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.54% annualized return.
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 74.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
GOLB.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 74.70%
- 3Y*
- 40.72%
- 5Y*
- 20.34%
- 10Y*
- 16.54%
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -5.28% | 104.63% | -8.37% | -10.78% | 23.96% | -10.18% | 7.04% | 17.70% | -9.90% | -6.89% |
GOLB.L Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF | 5.89% | 138.45% | 14.05% | 0.34% | 1.34% | -14.65% | 84.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLT.L and GOLB.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.39 |
The correlation between SPLT.L and GOLB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (10 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLT.L
GOLB.L
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLT.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.64 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 6.72 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLT.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.78 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.60 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.48 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.15 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, smaller than the maximum GOLB.L drawdown of -84.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and GOLB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLT.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -84.29% | +26.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.87% | -28.11% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.87% | -28.11% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | -37.60% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.00% | -44.07% | -0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.43% | -23.56% | -8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -49.39% | +15.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 11.08% | +5.33% |
Volatility
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) is 10.95%, while Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L) has a volatility of 14.80%. This indicates that SPLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLT.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 14.80% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 33.10% | +8.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 41.89% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 33.81% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 34.39% | -6.47% |
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLT.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLB.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLT.L vs. GOLB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLT.L nor GOLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLT.L and GOLB.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPLT.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLT.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOLB.L.
SPLT.L tracks Platinum, while GOLB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPLT.L and 0.65% for GOLB.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLT.L and GOLB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer