SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L
SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) and GLDA.L (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) are both Precious Metals funds - SPLT.L tracks the Platinum while GLDA.L tracks the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPLT.L returned 11.07%/yr vs 20.09%/yr for GLDA.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLT.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GLDA.L.
Performance
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than GLDA.L's 3.93% return.
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 74.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
GLDA.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 33.65%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -5.28% | 104.63% | -8.37% | -10.78% | 23.96% | -10.18% | 16.15% |
GLDA.L Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 3.93% | 53.56% | 28.19% | 7.26% | 12.68% | -3.12% | -2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLT.L and GLDA.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, SPLT.L and GLDA.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLT.L
GLDA.L
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLT.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.87 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 5.03 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLT.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.43 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.41 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.07 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than GLDA.L's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and GLDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLT.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -21.57% | -36.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.87% | -17.90% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.87% | -17.90% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | -17.90% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.43% | -16.00% | -16.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -5.40% | -28.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 6.67% | +9.74% |
Volatility
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) at 5.20%. This indicates that SPLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLT.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 5.20% | +5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 20.39% | +21.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 23.46% | +23.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 17.65% | +12.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 18.02% | +9.90% |
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLT.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLT.L vs. GLDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLT.L nor GLDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLT.L and GLDA.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPLT.L.
SPLT.L tracks Platinum, while GLDA.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPLT.L and 0.12% for GLDA.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLT.L and GLDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer