SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L
SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLT.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLT.L returned 7.15%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for CSP1.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLT.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLT.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 7.15%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 74.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -5.28% | 104.63% | -8.37% | -10.78% | 23.96% | -10.18% | 7.04% | 17.70% | -9.90% | -6.89% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 10.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLT.L and CSP1.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2011 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLT.L
CSP1.L
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLT.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.51 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 4.07 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 14.99 | -10.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLT.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.73 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.04 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 1.03 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.09 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLT.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -25.48% | -32.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.87% | -7.12% | -26.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.87% | -20.77% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | -20.77% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.00% | -25.48% | -19.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.43% | -0.24% | -32.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -3.32% | -30.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 1.94% | +14.47% |
Volatility
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that SPLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLT.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 2.62% | +8.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 7.16% | +34.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 10.62% | +36.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 14.31% | +16.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 15.57% | +12.35% |
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLT.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLT.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLT.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLT.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPLT.L.
SPLT.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. SPLT.L tracks Platinum, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPLT.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLT.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer