SPIN vs. PEPS
SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPIN returned 20.24% vs 33.38% for PEPS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPIN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
SPIN vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIN achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 11.24% return.
SPIN
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 33.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIN vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 3.07% | 14.14% | -0.96% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 11.24% | 20.32% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIN and PEPS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SPIN and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPIN vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
SPIN
PEPS
SPIN vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPIN | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 2.57 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 3.36 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.47 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.46 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 16.23 | -7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPIN | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.57 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.07 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SPIN vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIN drawdown since its inception was -16.85%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIN and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIN | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.85% | -21.26% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -9.80% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -2.78% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.09% | +0.26% |
Volatility
SPIN vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) is 1.80%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that SPIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPIN | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 2.75% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 9.82% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 13.05% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 18.32% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 18.32% | -3.98% |
SPIN vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPIN vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
SPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.64% | 8.20% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SPIN and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PEPS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to SPIN (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIN dropped -16.85% vs PEPS's -21.26%.
On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 33.38% vs 20.24% for SPIN. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 33.38% return vs 20.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPIN.
SPIN has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPIN and 0.10% for PEPS.
PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPIN and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer