PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIN vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIN vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIN achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 347.83% return.


SPIN

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.78%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.87%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
-2.18%
1M
110.86%
YTD
347.83%
6M
241.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIN vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
3.07%2.53%
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
347.83%-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIN and ARMW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.51

SPIN vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPIN
ARMW

Technology

39.0%
36.0%

Communication Services

12.2%

-

Financial Services

11.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%

-

Energy

2.9%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Technology

SPIN
39.0%
ARMW
36.0%

Communication Services

SPIN
12.2%
ARMW

-

Financial Services

SPIN
11.5%
ARMW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPIN
8.7%
ARMW

-

Healthcare

SPIN
8.3%
ARMW

-

Industrials

SPIN
8.0%
ARMW

-

Consumer Defensive

SPIN
3.8%
ARMW

-

Energy

SPIN
2.9%
ARMW

-

Utilities

SPIN
2.3%
ARMW

-

Basic Materials

SPIN
2.2%
ARMW

-

Real Estate

SPIN
1.6%
ARMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIN vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIN vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPINARMWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.68

SPIN vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPINARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

4.68

-3.72

Drawdowns

SPIN vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIN drawdown since its inception was -16.85%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIN and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPINARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.85%

-48.47%

+31.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-2.18%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-26.73%

+24.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

Volatility

SPIN vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPINARMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

88.68%

-78.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.34%

88.68%

-74.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.34%

88.68%

-74.34%

SPIN vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIN vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

SPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, less than ARMW's 15.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
15.72%16.38%0.00%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.64%8.20%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIN and ARMW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.72%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPIN and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIN and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer