PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIIX vs. SMQFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI S&P 500 Index Fund Class I (SPIIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIIX achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than SMQFX's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIIX has outperformed SMQFX with an annualized return of 14.24%, while SMQFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.49% annualized return.


SPIIX

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.61%
6M
7.37%
YTD
8.88%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
14.24%
ALL TIME*
10.70%

SMQFX

1D
3.48%
1M
-1.44%
6M
6.52%
YTD
16.94%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
10.49%
ALL TIME*
8.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPIIX
SEI S&P 500 Index Fund Class I
8.88%16.97%24.11%25.49%-18.84%28.04%17.66%30.72%-5.00%21.06%
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
16.94%40.14%9.19%16.67%-19.31%8.09%17.33%18.91%-17.67%33.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIIX and SMQFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014

0.63

The correlation between SPIIX and SMQFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (5 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIIX vs. SMQFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPIIX
SPIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SMQFX
SMQFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SMQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SMQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI S&P 500 Index Fund Class I (SPIIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPIIXSMQFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.57

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

8.42

-0.18

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SMQFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIIX and SMQFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIIX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than SMQFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIIX and SMQFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIIXSMQFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-40.14%

-15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-13.62%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.70%

-15.03%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

-36.37%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-40.14%

+6.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-7.79%

+5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-11.97%

+4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

4.14%

-2.02%

Volatility

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI S&P 500 Index Fund Class I (SPIIX) is 3.44%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that SPIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIIXSMQFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

7.77%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

18.12%

-8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

20.05%

-7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

18.46%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

17.23%

+1.65%

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMQFX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIIX vs. SMQFX - Dividend Comparison

SPIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, less than SMQFX's 25.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
25.85%30.23%6.43%3.24%5.32%17.70%1.80%1.89%11.55%2.70%2.15%1.69%
SPIIX
SEI S&P 500 Index Fund Class I
7.73%8.42%12.20%4.10%10.27%7.03%5.78%4.04%3.90%2.08%4.34%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIIX and SMQFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMQFX has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to SPIIX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIIX dropped -55.78% vs SMQFX's -40.14%.

SMQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIIX and SMQFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer