PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPICHA.SW vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPICHA.SW is traded in CHF, while EWP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWP values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPICHA.SW achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SPICHA.SW has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 7.65%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.69% annualized return.


SPICHA.SW

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.01%
YTD
2.38%
6M
5.46%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
7.65%

EWP

1D
-0.46%
1M
4.58%
YTD
5.19%
6M
8.88%
1Y
29.35%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis
2.38%17.65%6.05%5.82%-16.70%23.29%3.83%29.94%-8.35%19.42%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
5.19%55.55%14.03%18.59%-3.88%3.20%-12.04%10.03%-14.50%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SPICHA.SW and EWP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2011

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPICHA.SW
SPICHA.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPICHA.SWEWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.30

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.05

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

10.99

-7.53

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPICHA.SW and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPICHA.SWEWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.69

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.74

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.40

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.06

+0.50

Drawdowns

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPICHA.SW drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPICHA.SW and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPICHA.SWEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.92%

-65.58%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-9.65%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-15.52%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-26.71%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.92%

-46.45%

+19.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-1.42%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-36.45%

+31.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.68%

+0.41%

Volatility

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) is 3.25%, while iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that SPICHA.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPICHA.SWEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

5.49%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

14.51%

-5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.35%

17.46%

-6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

19.17%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

22.03%

-8.11%

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPICHA.SW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPICHA.SW vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

SPICHA.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than EWP's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.15%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis
2.22%2.64%2.96%2.94%2.83%2.26%2.55%2.60%3.21%2.62%3.04%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPICHA.SW and EWP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPICHA.SW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPICHA.SW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

SPICHA.SW tracks SPI® Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPICHA.SW and 0.50% for EWP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPICHA.SW and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer