SPHIX vs. PRCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity High Income Fund (SPHIX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX).
SPHIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 29, 1990. PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.
Performance
SPHIX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPHIX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHIX Fidelity High Income Fund | -0.85% | 9.85% | 9.57% | 10.99% | -13.08% | 3.55% | 2.47% | 14.27% | -2.39% | 8.60% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHIX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than PRCPX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHIX has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 5.26%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.83% annualized return.
SPHIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 8.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.26%
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPHIX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPHIX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank
SPHIX
PRCPX
SPHIX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Income Fund (SPHIX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHIX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 3.47 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.97 | 5.52 | -2.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.93 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 4.53 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 21.08 | -10.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHIX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 3.47 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.23 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 1.26 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.88 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHIX and PRCPX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPHIX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison
SPHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than PRCPX's 12.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHIX Fidelity High Income Fund | 6.01% | 6.43% | 6.10% | 5.41% | 3.91% | 4.07% | 4.71% | 5.10% | 6.02% | 5.40% | 6.07% | 5.59% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
SPHIX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHIX drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHIX and PRCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHIX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.36% | -23.07% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -3.03% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | -14.34% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.44% | -23.07% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -1.74% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -3.16% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.65% | +0.10% |
Volatility
SPHIX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity High Income Fund (SPHIX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 1.10%. This indicates that SPHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPHIX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 1.10% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 2.52% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 4.11% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 4.79% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 5.45% | +0.34% |