PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SPGP.L (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and XGSD.L (Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while XGSD.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGP.L returned 13.80%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for XGSD.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPGP.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XGSD.L.

Performance

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP.L achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than XGSD.L's 13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP.L has outperformed XGSD.L with an annualized return of 13.80%, while XGSD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.

SPGP.L

1D
5.49%
1M
-16.05%
YTD
-5.80%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
52.23%
3Y*
36.39%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
13.80%

XGSD.L

1D
1.33%
1M
2.47%
YTD
13.95%
6M
14.83%
1Y
32.98%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGP.L
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF		-5.80%137.41%12.81%3.72%-0.45%-9.15%19.43%41.00%-4.37%-2.80%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D		13.95%25.51%9.10%2.82%4.27%14.85%-3.40%16.23%-5.61%7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP.L and XGSD.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011

0.19

The correlation between SPGP.L and XGSD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SPGP.L
XGSD.L

Basic Materials

99.8%
5.8%

Industrials

0.2%
9.0%

Communication Services

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.1%

Energy

-

9.2%

Financial Services

-

40.7%

Healthcare

-

1.9%

Real Estate

-

7.2%

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

6.8%

Basic Materials

SPGP.L
99.8%
XGSD.L
5.8%

Industrials

SPGP.L
0.2%
XGSD.L
9.0%

Communication Services

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
6.1%

Energy

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
9.2%

Financial Services

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
40.7%

Healthcare

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
1.9%

Real Estate

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
7.2%

Technology

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
1.7%

Utilities

SPGP.L

-

XGSD.L
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF

Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with SPGP.L:
SPGP.L vs. GDXSPGP.L vs. IAUSPGP.L vs. EGLN.LSPGP.L vs. VOOSPGP.L vs. SCHGSPGP.L vs. AUCP.LSPGP.L vs. GDGB.L
Often compared with XGSD.L:
XGSD.L vs. GBDV.LXGSD.L vs. VTXGSD.L vs. VGWL.DEXGSD.L vs. XCX5.LXGSD.L vs. EXUS.LXGSD.L vs. XMME.LXGSD.L vs. TDIV.AS

Return for Risk

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SPGP.L
SPGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SPGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
XGSD.L
XGSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SPGP.LXGSD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.26
3.81

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.73
5.31

-3.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.71

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

6.89

-5.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

25.72

-21.32

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP.L and XGSD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP.L drawdown since its inception was -86.56%, which is greater than XGSD.L's maximum drawdown of -63.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP.L and XGSD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPGP.LXGSD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.56%

-63.91%

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.69%

-4.76%

-28.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.69%

-11.54%

-22.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.81%

-15.37%

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.71%

-31.91%

-11.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.46%

0.00%

-29.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.25%

-12.21%

-48.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.81%

1.28%

+10.53%

Volatility

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) at 2.48%. This indicates that SPGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPGP.LXGSD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.22%

2.48%

+10.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.40%

6.53%

+26.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.37%

8.62%

+32.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.91%

11.41%

+23.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.95%

13.99%

+19.96%

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XGSD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPGP.L vs. XGSD.L - Dividend Comparison

SPGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGP.L
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D		4.11%4.60%6.38%7.51%8.71%4.76%5.34%4.30%4.68%3.56%2.74%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

SPGP.L and XGSD.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGSD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGSD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPGP.L.

SPGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while XGSD.L is Global Equity Income. SPGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPGP.L and 0.50% for XGSD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP.L and XGSD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer