SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L
SPGP.L (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and IAUP.L (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while IAUP.L is a Gold fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGP.L returned 14.96%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for IAUP.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPGP.L is traded in GBp, while IAUP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAUP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGP.L achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than IAUP.L's 2.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPGP.L having a 14.96% annualized return and IAUP.L not far ahead at 14.99%.
SPGP.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 64.79%
- 3Y*
- 38.31%
- 5Y*
- 19.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
IAUP.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 65.17%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | 1.44% | 137.41% | 12.81% | 3.72% | -0.45% | -9.15% | 19.43% | 41.00% | -4.37% | -2.80% |
IAUP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.08% | 135.86% | 13.48% | 3.92% | -0.48% | -9.46% | 19.97% | 40.10% | -4.24% | -2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGP.L and IAUP.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SPGP.L and IAUP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGP.L
IAUP.L
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SPGP.L
IAUP.L
Industrials
SPGP.L
IAUP.L
Communication Services
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Energy
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Financial Services
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Healthcare
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Real Estate
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Technology
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Utilities
SPGP.L
-
IAUP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPGP.L
IAUP.L
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPGP.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 6.00 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPGP.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.55 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.61 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGP.L drawdown since its inception was -79.54%, roughly equal to the maximum IAUP.L drawdown of -79.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP.L and IAUP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGP.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.54% | -79.55% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.66% | -27.83% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -27.83% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -34.46% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.71% | -43.96% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.04% | -23.65% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.31% | -42.75% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 10.82% | -0.01% |
Volatility
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) is 13.10%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that SPGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGP.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 14.32% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.23% | 33.78% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.28% | 41.83% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.56% | 32.90% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.31% | 33.38% | -1.07% |
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPGP.L and IAUP.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPGP.L nor IAUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SPGP.L and IAUP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPGP.L and IAUP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
SPGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while IAUP.L is Gold. SPGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while IAUP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index.
Find the right allocation for SPGP.L and IAUP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer