PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPGP.L is traded in GBp, while IAUP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAUP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP.L achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than IAUP.L's 2.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPGP.L having a 14.96% annualized return and IAUP.L not far ahead at 14.99%.


SPGP.L

1D
0.61%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.44%
6M
6.67%
1Y
64.79%
3Y*
38.31%
5Y*
19.91%
10Y*
14.96%

IAUP.L

1D
0.89%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.08%
6M
6.73%
1Y
65.17%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
20.01%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGP.L
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF
1.44%137.41%12.81%3.72%-0.45%-9.15%19.43%41.00%-4.37%-2.80%
IAUP.L
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc
2.08%135.86%13.48%3.92%-0.48%-9.46%19.97%40.10%-4.24%-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP.L and IAUP.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2011

0.92

The correlation between SPGP.L and IAUP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGP.L
IAUP.L

Basic Materials

99.8%
99.8%

Industrials

0.2%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SPGP.L
99.8%
IAUP.L
99.8%

Industrials

SPGP.L
0.2%
IAUP.L
0.2%

Communication Services

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Energy

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Financial Services

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Healthcare

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Real Estate

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Technology

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Utilities

SPGP.L

-

IAUP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP.L
SPGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SPGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUP.L
IAUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IAUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGP.LIAUP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.33

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

6.00

-0.03

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the IAUP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP.L and IAUP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGP.LIAUP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.55

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.12

0.00

Drawdowns

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP.L drawdown since its inception was -79.54%, roughly equal to the maximum IAUP.L drawdown of -79.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP.L and IAUP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGP.LIAUP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.54%

-79.55%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.66%

-27.83%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.66%

-27.83%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.81%

-34.46%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.71%

-43.96%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.04%

-23.65%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-42.75%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

10.82%

-0.01%

Volatility

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) is 13.10%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that SPGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGP.LIAUP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

14.32%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.23%

33.78%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.28%

41.83%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.56%

32.90%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.31%

33.38%

-1.07%

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPGP.L and IAUP.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

SPGP.L vs. IAUP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPGP.L nor IAUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SPGP.L and IAUP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPGP.L and IAUP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

SPGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while IAUP.L is Gold. SPGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while IAUP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP.L and IAUP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer