PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond USD Hdg UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPFU.DE) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPFU.DE is traded in USD, while EUN3.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUN3.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFU.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than EUN3.DE's -3.41% return.


SPFU.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.49%
6M
0.41%
YTD
0.57%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*

EUN3.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-1.29%
YTD
-3.41%
1Y
-1.88%
3Y*
0.05%
5Y*
-3.91%
10Y*
-1.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPFU.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond USD Hdg UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.57%4.89%3.05%6.77%-11.22%-1.54%5.34%8.06%2.43%
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-3.41%6.83%-3.91%3.42%-17.54%-6.95%9.37%5.77%-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFU.DE and EUN3.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018

0.68

The correlation between SPFU.DE and EUN3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPFU.DE
SPFU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPFU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EUN3.DE
EUN3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond USD Hdg UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPFU.DE) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPFU.DEEUN3.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.96

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

-0.38

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

-0.73

+4.43

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFU.DE and EUN3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum EUN3.DE drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFU.DE and EUN3.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPFU.DEEUN3.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-33.55%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-5.00%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.39%

-7.80%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.00%

-25.97%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-27.42%

+26.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-21.41%

+17.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

2.56%

-1.73%

Volatility

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond USD Hdg UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPFU.DE) is 0.88%, while iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that SPFU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUN3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPFU.DEEUN3.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

1.33%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

4.38%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

6.32%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.26%

7.75%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

6.95%

-3.15%

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFU.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EUN3.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPFU.DE vs. EUN3.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPFU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than EUN3.DE's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.61%3.09%2.08%1.28%0.68%0.52%0.94%1.05%0.90%0.88%0.91%0.51%
SPFU.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond USD Hdg UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.15%3.03%2.73%2.02%1.41%1.22%1.51%1.25%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPFU.DE and EUN3.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPFU.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPFU.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUN3.DE.

SPFU.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index (USD Hedged), while EUN3.DE tracks FTSE G7 Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPFU.DE and 0.20% for EUN3.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPFU.DE and EUN3.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer