SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE
SPFD.DE (State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and XUEB.DE (Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SPFD.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond Index (EUR Hedged) while XUEB.DE tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPFD.DE returned -1.83%/yr vs 2.85%/yr for XUEB.DE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPFD.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XUEB.DE.
Performance
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFD.DE achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than XUEB.DE's 3.66% return.
SPFD.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- 1Y
- 2.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- -1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
XUEB.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFD.DE State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -1.76% | 12.45% | -4.39% | 6.63% | -12.77% | -9.84% | 11.20% |
XUEB.DE Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C | 3.66% | 1.23% | 11.99% | 7.34% | -14.37% | 5.65% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPFD.DE and XUEB.DE is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2020 | 0.04 |
The correlation between SPFD.DE and XUEB.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPFD.DE
XUEB.DE
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE) and Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPFD.DE | XUEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.33 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 3.83 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 10.83 | -9.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPFD.DE | XUEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.75 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.32 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.25 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFD.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, which is greater than XUEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFD.DE and XUEB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFD.DE | XUEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.91% | -17.41% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -2.70% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.24% | -13.41% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.77% | -17.41% | -9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.71% | -0.40% | -11.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -6.25% | -7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 0.96% | +1.26% |
Volatility
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) at 1.29%. This indicates that SPFD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPFD.DE | XUEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 1.29% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.38% | 3.95% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.27% | 5.93% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 8.74% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.88% | 8.56% | +0.32% |
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XUEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPFD.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPFD.DE nor XUEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPFD.DE and XUEB.DE have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SPFD.DE.
SPFD.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while XUEB.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPFD.DE and 0.25% for XUEB.DE.
Find the right allocation for SPFD.DE and XUEB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer